Happiness and thunderstorms
| Somebody left their umbrella outside. Result – awesome picture |
I wish I was the kind of writer that could describe accurately how much I love storms – thunder, lightning and rain.
| Somebody left their umbrella outside. Result – awesome picture |
I wish I was the kind of writer that could describe accurately how much I love storms – thunder, lightning and rain.
Last month I came across the following blog post – Golly Blog – by a guy called Lemn Sissay. Now before I even start – let me just state I don’t have an answer to several hundred years of horrid. None.
In brief, and without the nuances, this fellow was offended by the sale of gollywogs in a shop in Scotland and what he perceived as a perpetuation of racism by the woman that owned the shop. She sold them, therefore she was racist. I have read the blog, the comments, the spin offs, some of the media pertaining to the story and I say that the truth is somewhere in the middle.
![]() |
| The ‘offending’ photo (source) |
You see, if you do not live a life blighted by bigotry, you don’t necessarily see it. It’s not that you are selfish, it’s not that you are horrid or racist or mean. If you hear people talk about the effects of bigotry on their lives, it can be hard to imagine it, because it is not your reality. And most of us are busy just getting on with the business of living. We don’t spend loads of time wondering why we aren’t somebody else, and we VERY rarely wonder why we aren’t somebody else with more problems.
I mean we say things like “but I don’t see why the gays need to get married” when you yourself would be mortified if your heterosexual children had babies without being married because you think that true commitment means marriage.
We say things like “but everybody knows that the Aboriginals were here first, why does it have to be in the constitution” when we get offended that we weren’t mentioned in Joe’s wedding speech because we bloody well introduced them.
We say things like “well of course its best to detain refugees somewhere like Villawood because they could be a rapist or a criminal”, at the same time as we wonder if the girl wasn’t just a bit stupid going back to the home of a footballer on Mad Monday.
We say things like “that’s just Al on her soapbox again” completely dismissing the fact that there is room on my soapbox for two. Or three. Or four. And that we have plenty of time to complain about the price of bananas or smelly people on the train.
And that was what really struck me with the Lemn Sissay blog. He lives his life expecting bigotry. She lives hers expecting none. And instead of a dialogue there was defensiveness. Hurt. Anger. A distortion of two truths which are equally valid.
I confess that up until recently, there have been gollywogs in our household. I have never seen them as sinister, in fact, they have been beloved toys gifted to me as a child and then my children. The fact that they were black and dressed in stripes had absolutely no relevance to me. They were just beloved toys in stripy clothes.
And that is good on one level. We should make sure that signs that are indicative of evil or malice lose their potency by reducing them to nothing. It is ultimately a rag doll no matter who dreamt it up when and where. But it’s symbolism is something extraordinary, its power is ongoing. It represents a big big issue which is still not resolved.
It is something on which people can focus their rage, their hurt and their bewilderment. And that makes it bad. For if we can take away those symbols, if we acknowledge that these small toys which mean nothing negative in our own bigotry free world, but which means a world of pain in another… we can in a small way make a difference.
So the gollies are gone from our house. Because in reading Lemn Sissay’s blog, I got to thinking about how we can all justify small breaches of peace and tolerate small acts of bigotry. I read the comments and was embarrassed to find that even this bleeding heart leftie socialist was understanding the points of view that basically said “duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude, it’s just a doll, chill.”
Ouch.
What is that teaching my girls? What if they ask me later on ‘Mum, did you know that gollywogs are symbols of oppression and really upset some people because it reminds them of some really horrible things?’ and my only answer was ‘Yeah, but duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuudes aren’t they are cute’?
What then? What next?
I was at a celebration of life on the weekend – a real one. Cancer 0. Friend 1. Lots of really lovely people were there – friends from all over the place, all parts of her life, all come together to be part of a giant circle of love.
“I know what it is! YOU’VE SHAVED YOUR ARMPITS”
Silence.
And there it was – the funniest, the most random comment of the weekend. May the rest of your week continue a hidden gem like that one. You’re welcome.

My dad says I’m like my mum.
![]() |
| Well said Mr Rohn |
Recently, I found myself physically grimacing when somebody referred to my daughters as ‘adorable princesses’. I really feel strongly about the word ‘princess’ in relation to MY small people. Really strongly.
1. They are not. I’m not a monarch, but husband is not a monarch and there is no monarchy in our history apart from a rumour that we are distantly related to the woman referred to as the “Catholic whore of King George IV”. Which we are not according to the chief genealogist in our family. Which is a pity – because everybody likes a salty story in the family tree.
| No frog when kissed becomes a prince |
2. Even by the urban definition of princesses as ‘spoilt, pampered and sheltered from real life’, my girls don’t qualify. They’ve been involved in social justice marches since they were babes-in-utereo and we don’t automatically switch off the news or avoid stories that don’t have happy endings. They might be but 1 and 3 but we talk about it all. If they are to learn compassion, empathy and how lucky they are, they need to learn about it as naturally as they learn about using please and thank you, or how yelling the word ‘bottom’ is never going to lose it’s comedic value no matter how old you get.
| She thinks they fit and that’s all that matters |
3. The Disney definition of a princess as somebody who needs rescuing (preferably after being kissed by a man they have never met) goes against the grain of all sensible personal safety messages that we seek to ingrain in our girls. Firstly, if somebody is kissing when you wake up and you didn’t ask for it – kick the bastards in the bollocks and run like the wind, screaming as loudly as you can. Secondly, if your stepmother is a bitch and makes you work rather than going out and getting an education and doesn’t give you the love you deserve – I will be coming back to haunt your Daddy for his ill conceived choice of a second wife with every supernatural bastardy I can lay my ghostly hands on.
4. My 3 year old wants to be taller so she can drive a cement mixer. I’m proud of her for having the foresight to understand that the cement is always going to be a useful thing and therefore being the driver/operator of a cement mixer is a valid, long term career option. A career like that will always have relevance. Unfortunately, monarchies will not.
| Tiaras are not just for royalty |
5. People use the word princesses to indicate that they think girls are beautiful. All small people are beautiful. When my 3 year old was a baby she looked like Chairman Mao. When my 1 year old was a baby she looked like Paul Livingston’s Flacco. I can tell you quite honestly, that I have never seen two more beautiful babies in my life.
I am proud that when you ask Tully what she is she’ll answer all sorts of things like “I am hiwarious”, or “I am impossible” or “I am orrrrrrrsome”. If I say to them “who are my favourite girls in the world?” they’ll both answer “ME”. They interchangeably hear me refer to them as “my girls”, “dudes” or if I’m cross they even hear “GIRLFRIEND WHAT ARE YOU DOING?”. I throw my “sweethearts” and my “darlings” and “my beautifuls” and “my gorgeous'” around with the gay abandon of the endearment over user. I have no problem with them understanding that they are beautiful to me in every single way, inside and out.
But they aren’t princesses.
They are better than that.
Discovered Bitstrips yet?
![]() |
| Duuuudddeeeee. Uncool. |